![c++ - uniform_int_distribution used wrong here? (my results seem not equally distributed) - Stack Overflow c++ - uniform_int_distribution used wrong here? (my results seem not equally distributed) - Stack Overflow](https://i.stack.imgur.com/JqAIo.jpg)
c++ - uniform_int_distribution used wrong here? (my results seem not equally distributed) - Stack Overflow
JF Bastien 🔗 @jfbastien@mastodon.social on Twitter: "🔔🔔🔔 My April 1st fun last night: a new C++ Undefined Sanitizer runtime: The ␇ Runtime Every time you exercise UB, a bell chimes. Unless you're
![Ben Porter on Twitter: "Generating uniform integers using <random> is not portable across compilers!! This example shows identical seed results in different numbers across the big three compilers. (Note: the engine itself Ben Porter on Twitter: "Generating uniform integers using <random> is not portable across compilers!! This example shows identical seed results in different numbers across the big three compilers. (Note: the engine itself](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DQZhLBvUIAAaajz.jpg)
Ben Porter on Twitter: "Generating uniform integers using <random> is not portable across compilers!! This example shows identical seed results in different numbers across the big three compilers. (Note: the engine itself
![c++ - uniform_int_distribution used wrong here? (my results seem not equally distributed) - Stack Overflow c++ - uniform_int_distribution used wrong here? (my results seem not equally distributed) - Stack Overflow](https://i.stack.imgur.com/ZNUsG.jpg)
c++ - uniform_int_distribution used wrong here? (my results seem not equally distributed) - Stack Overflow
![ubsan: signed integer overflow in uniform_int_distribution implementation · Issue #5684 · fish-shell/fish-shell · GitHub ubsan: signed integer overflow in uniform_int_distribution implementation · Issue #5684 · fish-shell/fish-shell · GitHub](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/291142/53202900-8ad80180-35dc-11e9-9d95-2da595b9c281.png)